My development in understanding information literacy through use of models and TL professional aspects developed through my readings, discussions and library experiences.
Whilst I feel I have developed some understanding of the concepts and appreciate the benefits of an information literate school community, I am not certain of how to create it. The benefits of support from the principal and school community are obvious, the opportunities for the TL to impact are also evident, but there appear to be too many dimensions to the subject and I have not found a certain route to success!
In attempting to compare and contrast three popular information skills models I initially focussed on the philosophical foundations such as the behaviourist and constructive influences. However, I found that the paper was too long and the methodology was showing more similarities than differences. Whilst I would have liked to develop the analysis further, it was abandoned in favour of a focus that centred more on differences in concept and process.
I did not give up on summarising the models and continued to experiment with a schema. I finally settled for a simple chart based on realms of experience. The idea was inspired by (White, 2010) blog comments on the experience aspect of the models. I finally found a framework through which I could succinctly expose the key similarities and differences of the models.
Finding information has become a low level skill, what matters, is working with learners to help them identify and use the information strategically to answer the inquiry (Leppard, 2003). The research process evokes use of information literacy skills; skills that are multi-functional and can support lifelong learning. The TL’s combined skills in education and information management presents an opportunity to lead the school community in the development of lifelong learning skills.
The literature provides support for the importance of school libraries and the TL on educational achievement (Lynch, Pegg, & Panizzon, 2007), (Lonsdale, 2003), and US; (Loetscher & Wolls, 1998). Impacts have been measured in terms of reading, literacy or learning generally.
There is support for TL/library contribution through the three professional aspects of the TL’s role identified in the standards; knowledge, application and professional commitment. There is some Australian based research support however, the bulk is American.
The TL’s leadership in areas of information literacy can be transformational, and through collaboration contribute to a strong school culture that supports high achievement.
I found a challenge in attempting to select 3 professional standards out of 12 that are critical to student learning outcomes. Following consultation with my colleagues the focus was initially on standards with strong pedagogical links; I initially selected 1.2, 2.2 and 2.4.
Research was collected and writing well underway when I realised the following:
1. Support for a multi dimensional view of professional quality impacting student outcomes Lynch (Lynch, Pegg, & Panizzon, 2007) . This elevated my opinion of the impact of professional commitment on student outcomes and in particular the TC’s opportunity to show leadership in the development of information literacy skills. Further support for multiple dimensions of impact are supported by Smith’s study (Smith, 2001), that grouped program development, leadership, collaboration, library technology and school technology as significant influencers of student performance.
2. Whilst focussing on education outcomes, I had neglected a significant portion of the TL’s role; library information services management. The literature was rich with support for the significant impact that library information and its management contribute.
I thought the key to this paper was lifelong learning and searched the forum for clues. Most of the discussions tended to be general. Whilst Natalie Copeland in Module 4 was able to link the importance of lifelong learning with information literacy models, she identifies a successful learner is one who involves critical thinking. She identifies the future where there is an abundance of information available and we need to teach future generations to judge relevance and value of information that is presented (Copeland, 2010).
The readings confirmed my view but were largely general. I finally located a paper by (Moore, 2002) that pulled together the concepts of lifelong learning, information literacy, information models, skills and characteristics of the TL. In fact the paper applied an even higher dimension to information literacy it not only linked to lifelong learning but to the rights of a democratic society.
I took lifelong learning skills to be the skill that survives from a good education and that information literacy is a key ingredient. I deduced that information literacy is supported and enhanced by the standards for professional excellence and information skills models. This provided me with a general link for the two elements of this paper as follows:

The other crucial link in this review came from reinforcing the significance of pedagogy in the TL role, and that it relies on both how one teaches and what is taught. Research has consistently supported that it is the quality of pedagogy that most powerfully impacts quality learning outcomes (DET, 2003).
Ultimately the essential learning from this review is to remember that the lasting
impact of good education is teaching learners to learn how to learn, and cope with the ever changing challenges of life. The value of a TL is to contribute skills and knowledge to students, but also the broader school community and support transformational plans and a learning culture. The TL should be a filter not funnel for colleagues and students, they are best placed in schools to reflect changes in information and how it is organised for learners. The TL can have a profound influence on the construction of meaning (Leppard, 2003).
The TL’s participation in teams provides an opportunity to play several roles such as directly support individual students in learning activities through application of pedagogical skills, multi-purpose research support to teachers and students, network the school, continually scan and filter for new developments. An effective TL enables new information to be transformed into knowledge, by engaging learners to construct knowledge rather than regurgitate it.
References
Copeland, N. (2010, April 13). Module 4. Retrieved May 20, 2010, from CSU Forums: http://forums.csu.edu.au/perl/forums.pl?task=frameset&forum_id=ETL401_201030_W_D_Sub6_forum&message_id=4386765
DET. (May 2003). Quality Teaching Framework Discussion Paper. pp 1-16. Retrieved March 01, 2010, from Curriculum Support: http://www.curriculumsupport.education.nsw.gov.au/qualityteach/assets/pdf/qt_disc_pap.pdf.
Leppard, L. (2003, Vol 17, Issue 3). The role of the teacher librarian in essential learning. Retrieved May 2010, from ASLA: www.asla.org.au/pubs/access/a_commentary_170303.htm
Loetscher, D. V., & Wolls, B. (1998). The Information Literacy Movement of the School Library Media Field: a Preliminary Summary of the Research. Retrieved May 18, 2010, from http://slisweb.sjsu.edu/cources/250.loertscher/modelloer.html
Lonsdale, M. (2003). Impact of School Libraries on Student Achievement. Camberwell, VIC: Australian Council for Educational Research.
Lynch, T., Pegg, J., & Panizzon, D. (2007). Identifying and Analysing Processes in NSW Public Schooling Producing Outstanding Educational Outcomes in Mathematics. Proceedings of the 30th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia. 2. Australia: MERGA Inc.
Moore, P. (2002). An Analysis of Information Literacy Education Worldwide. Information Literacy Meeting of Experts. Prague: White Paper prepared for UNESCO, the U.S. National Commission on Libraries and Information Science, and the National Forum on Information Literacy.
Smith, E. G. (2001). Texas School Libraries:Standards,Resources, Services, and Students'Performance. Austin,Texas: EGS Research and Consulting.
Todd, R. J. (2003, Janurary 04). How to prove you boost student achievement. Retrieved March 08, 2010, from School Library Journal: http://www.schoollibraryjournal.com/index.asp?layout=article&articleid=CA287119
White, R. (2010). Information Literacy Models. Retrieved May 23, 2010, from http://rebeccawhite-etl504.blogspot.com